Read an epic defense of Zack Snyder’s Superman

Author Jason McLean posted an epic defense of Zack Snyder’s cinematic Superman on his Facebook page, and it was so good,we had to post it here. You can click here to check out McLean’s books on Amazon.

I’ve had it with the fanboys. The real problem with Dawn of Justice and
Man of Steel isn’t how Snyder has portrayed Superman or Batman, it’s
how he has portrayed us. The Epic of Gilgamesh has a scene where the
Mesopotamian goddess of love is enraged at the titular hero for denying
her advances. Gilgamesh had pointed out that all of her previous lovers
had met with a rather tragic end, i.e. she disposed of them once she
was done with them. So she goes to her father screaming, “He told me
what I did to my face!” (Paraphrase) We are that goddess to Snyder’s
Gilgamesh.

Let me start with the number one complaint, Superman killed
Zod in MOS. Was it shocking to see Supes break Zod’s neck, yes. It was
meant to. Not because it was out of character, but because Henry
Cavill made us feel Superman’s pain with that primal scream.

Please
note that Superman has straight up murdered Zod in every single
iteration of the character regardless of medium (except the 90’s
animated series which threw him into the Phantom Zone). In the comics
Superman de-powered all three and killed them using Kryptonite, why?
Because if their powers came back no one could stop their devastation
and humanity would be wiped out… kinda sounds like Afleck’s Batman,
doesn’t it? In Superman 2 he permanently depowers them, crushes Zod’s
hand to powder, and them throws him off a cliff. Let me reiterate: Zod
was permanently depowered. Supes only got his powers back because
Brando gave them to him, and I don’t think Zod or his posse brought
their holographic space daddies with them. Zod was no longer a threat
and Christopher Reeves smiles while he executes all three of them. No,
it was not killing a murderous Zod who was actively trying to commit
genocide that we had a problem with, it was the fact that it bothered
him.

Everyone has been pointing to “All-Star Superman” (which I
love) and saying that’s who Superman is, not Snyder’s “Emo-Superman.”
But what is the difference between MOS/BvS and “All Star?” The ordinary
people. In “All-Star Superman” everyone loves and trusts Superman, the
only one who resents him is Lex Luthor, but in the Snyder-verse NO ONE
trusts or even knows what to do with Superman. Snyder has used Superman
to hold a mirror up to us and that bothers us. We’re used to seeing
the best of us in the people around Superman. Those characters that
fawn all over him and trust him because he’s the good guy and we all
deserve to be saved by this good-looking alien who asks nothing of us.
Instead, Snyder has said, “Firstly, we should feel the suffering he
endures to help us, and no, in the real world (we’re clamoring to see on
screen) people would fear/hate him or worship him.”

If you doubt me,
look at the election. I don’t care which candidate you discuss, all are
presented as either God’s sovereign gift to mankind or they are
baby-eating reptilian aliens. No one says, “Hey, maybe they are all
flawed humans trying to do the best they can. Let’s see whose ideas are
the best.” Snyder even points this out in BvS when Superman saves the
rocket capsule, there is a phone interview where a voice says, “Maybe he
isn’t a god or the devil, but a guy trying to do the best he can.”

Ultimately, Snyder’s movies remind us that we are petty and small, that
we aren’t people who are good and deserve to be rescued. Rather Snyder
has given us the most inspirational Superman we have ever gotten, a
flawed human being who is trying to do the best he can, just as we
should.

Lastly, I do think we’ll get more of the Superman we’re used
to in the future, not because we screamed for it, but because in the
film (spoiler alert) Superman’s sacrifice made everyone realize that he
was willing to die to save them. That in spite of everything, he still
fought to do the right thing, and that is very much a Superman thing to
do.